The people behind the work.
MFRS is built around people who understand that research does not become reliable simply because a questionnaire is well written. Someone still has to plan the work, reach the right respondents, supervise the field, notice what is going wrong, check what comes back, and take responsibility for the final output.
Leadership that stays close to the work.
MFRS is guided by people who contribute to the organisation in different but connected ways — from company leadership and governance to strategy, operations, research and field delivery. Responsibility remains close to the work rather than sitting only at the top of an organisational chart.
Mohit Sagar
View Full Profile →
Manish Patel
View Full Profile →
Anil Kumar
View Full Profile →Specialist expertise aligned to project requirements.
MFRS engages consultants and specialists with relevant domain and technical expertise to support research, assessment and project delivery according to assignment requirements.
Shivnarayan Prajapati
View Full Profile →
Vineet Kumar Dwivedi
View Full Profile →Field leadership built around practical execution.
Field operations and state-level coordination are led by this team, translating research design and project requirements into on-ground execution across the states where MFRS is active.
Anuj Pal
View Full Profile →
Satendra Kumar
View Full Profile →
Akhilesh Maurya
View Full Profile →
Luvkush Kushwaha
View Full Profile →
Megha Gadhve
View Full Profile →
Pankaj Kumar
View Full Profile →
Tarun Kumar Das
View Full Profile →
Bilal Ahmad Jan
View Full Profile →
Badarsang Thakor
View Full Profile →
Rajni Kant
View Full Profile →
Sandeep Rajput
View Full Profile →
Shubham P. Shende
View Full Profile →Field professionals supporting research delivery on the ground.
MFRS field personnel support survey execution, respondent engagement, data collection and day-to-day field implementation across assigned locations and project areas.
Pratap Kumar
Manas Ranjan Parida
Rochak Jaiswal
Govind Gupta
Bhumi Gadhave
Umesh Kumar
Laxmipriya Sethy
Chumki Das
Nitin Kumar Barman
The functions that keep the organisation running.
Research support, data, IT, corporate communication, accounts and administration are coordinated from the Head Office, allowing field leadership to stay focused on execution.
Anjali Singh
Neetu Patel
Manish Verma
Lokesh Rathore
Shubham Raykwar
Pooja Pal
Aakash Sourakhiya
Sachin Kumar
Rohit Lowanshi
Sneha Ajay Kumbhare
Aakash Lowanshi
Shubham Bansal
Ritik Bhadoriya
A permanent base, with project teams built around the assignment.
Field research rarely requires exactly the same people in exactly the same numbers for every project. A household survey in one district and a multi-state monitoring exercise may require completely different combinations of investigators, supervisors, coordinators, data personnel and quality checks.
MFRS therefore builds field teams according to the actual assignment — including geography, sample size, language, respondent profile, timeline and supervision requirements.
The number of people may change from project to project. Responsibility for planning, supervision, documentation and quality does not.
Plan
Understand the assignment, geography, sample, tools, timeline and reporting requirements before deployment begins.
Build the team
Match field personnel and supervisors to the location, language, respondent profile and workload.
Stay close to the field
Track progress, resolve practical problems, supervise execution and flag issues while there is still time to correct them.
Check before handover
Review data, documentation and required deliverables before the assignment is treated as complete.
Experience matters when it changes the way a project is handled.
The people working with MFRS bring practical experience across field research, supervision, coordination and project execution. We value that experience for what it helps teams notice, anticipate and resolve while the work is still in the field.
Knowing the field
A route that looks short on a map may take much longer in practice. Respondent availability, weather, language, permissions and local conditions can change a day’s plan quickly.
Knowing the people
Good fieldwork depends on more than deploying a large number of investigators. The right people have to be matched with the right geography, respondents and supervision.
Knowing when something is wrong
An experienced supervisor should be able to notice unusual completion patterns, respondent access problems, weak probing or inconsistent data before those issues reach the final dataset.
We keep individual experience and MFRS assignments separate.
Professional experience gained by members of the team before joining or establishing MFRS is not presented as work completed by MFRSINDIA PRIVATE LIMITED. Company assignments, previous professional experience and self-initiated work are identified separately wherever that distinction matters.
The work matters more than the designation.
Titles help define responsibility. They do not replace it. Whether someone is coordinating a state, supervising five investigators or checking a dataset, the basic expectations remain similar.
Finishing quickly is useful only when the work remains reliable.
A respondent is a person giving us time and information, not just another number required to complete a sample.
Field problems are easier to solve when they are reported while the team is still in the field.
Important decisions, checks, field issues and handovers should leave a usable record.
Respondent information, client material and internal project data should be handled responsibly.
A task should not be marked complete simply because the deadline is close.
The structure follows the assignment.
MFRS structures project teams around the requirements of each engagement. Depending on the geography, sample, methodology and timeline, an assignment may involve field investigators, supervisors, coordinators, research support, data personnel and quality-review functions.
The composition may vary from one assignment to another, while responsibility for coordination, supervision, documentation and quality remains clearly defined.
The right project team depends on the work that has to be done.
Share the geography, sample, respondent group, timeline and expected outputs with MFRS. We can then plan the field structure and level of supervision the assignment actually requires.
Discuss a Project →